Pacing yourself: “Micro-rests” and “Macro-rests” (Vocal Longevity)

Reading time: 3.5 minutes

I’ve done articles before on vocal longevity, on making sure you give yourself rest periods when practicing and singing. This week I want to expand on this in a way that most of you should find helpful – I want to discuss the idea of “micro-rests” and “macro-rests”.

Think of it like someone running a marathon.

Runners HAVE to pace themselves. Sometimes they will reduce their speed a little, or a lot, often before a key stretch they know is going to take a lot out of them. It is personal for each runner what their strategy is (mainly based on what they find challenging or fatiguing) but they must each strategise on how to pace themselves and above all, to do it in a way that allows them to keep going and maintain their performance.
Continue reading “Pacing yourself: “Micro-rests” and “Macro-rests” (Vocal Longevity)”

Worship Leader Vocal Training – How NOT to kill your voice and those of the congregation

I’ve written a few articles that cover how the voice is built in a particular way, as well as worship leader vocal training. As a result of the way the voice is built, putting songs in certain keys can really wreak havoc on the correct operation of the voice. It’s therefore important to put songs in a key that, aside from actually sounding good, are not killing people’s voices.

Now, the majority of artists or performers (whether professional or amateur) outside of the church or corporate singing (e.g. choirs) don’t have to worry about the keys of their songs causing other people to strain or hurt their voices. They put the song wherever they like, and people usually just listen, or mumble along or shout out their favourite lines. No big deal. However, within certain contexts, there are people whose roles mean that their key choice is forced on those around them…

Worship Leaders

One of the biggest problems I’ve encountered with students coming to me from a background of being a worship leader, or from singing in church, is heavily ingrained bad habits. These bad habits are reinforced by hours and hours of singing songs in keys that is not appropriate for their voice, or those around them.

There are bridges in the voices, passageways (if used correctly) that connect different parts of the voices together. Singing right on a bridge or one note either side of it is harder than singing in the ‘island’ between these bridges. This means, if you can sing a song where the top notes are ‘on’ one of your bridges, it will always be easier to sing and sound better if you sing the song in a key where the top notes are placed ‘away’ from your bridges.

For the average singer, particularly males, it is possible-to-probable that they have not learned to move through their first bridge yet, and so you cannot put the song in a key where the notes are higher than first bridge (E4) and expect them to find that easy or even doable… yet worship leaders worldwide insist on placing songs in keys where the top note IS E4 or just slightly higher. I have regularly played with in bands with worship leaders who insist this is where their voice sounds best and that the song ‘lacks something’ if it is not put in this key. They themselves pull, strain and push to get to those notes, and expect the same of the congregation. Except that they have a microphone and PA behind them, the congregants do not.

Moving a song away from one of your bridges can help with singability and tonal quality no end. For example, if there is a song with a single top note of E4 in the key of E, simply moving it to the key of D places that single top note away from the bridge to D4. Or in another example, where the top note is a repeated or sustained top note, making it a C#4 or a C4 can make things soooo much easier for everyone.

This kind of approach makes songs much easier to sing and will actually make the worship leader AND congregation sound better, as the voice is more in balance and in less of a strained condition.

Not convinced? We’ve only looked at the issue of bridges affecting male singers. Let’s look at female singers.

Double or Quits

Many female singers find that they simply cannot sing men’s parts in the original octave, but also struggle to sing it in the octave above. They often revert to a harmony line, which allows them to sing somewhere in between the original octave and the upper one.

This is because if a top note is E4, the octave above is E5, which is right on their second bridge. This is tough. Even changing the key to make the top note D5 is still tough just because the higher you go, the more of a teetering tower of cards the voice can become without a decent level of vocal training. In such scenarios, placing the top note on a C#, C or B is recommended for women.

For the equivalent octave for men, this can sometimes feel a touch low, so I generally recommend D, C# or C as the top note. You can see there is a good deal of overlap there.

What’s wrong with harmony?

Absolutely nothing, but if people are having to change what they’re singing because the key isn’t sustainable for them, then I would argue the key is poorly chosen for corporate singing. I mentioned that female singers often revert to a harmony so as not to struggle with the melody. A harmony is just another melody that complements the original melody. It often closely mirrors the original melody.

What female singers learn to do is sing a harmony that sits more or less halfway between where two octaves of the melody would sit, i.e. if the top note is an E4 / E5 (depending on the octave), females often revert to around B4 to make it singable. This tells us a lot about the comfort zone of the female voice, and we would do well to take that into consideration.

So what do I suggest?

Worship leaders – if you get comments of ‘that was tough to sing’, if you find your own voice is shot after just a few songs, if you find that people drop out for the high notes or women are reverting to harmonies out of comfort, then you are killing people’s voices, including your own. Find better keys for your keys and you will find that people become far less distracted by the discomfort in their own throat during a worship time, and you’ll ALSO start getting a LOT more compliments on how good you sound.

The Power of Singing With Simplicity

I want to talk to you today about singing with simplicity.

I was chatting with another vocal coach this week about what fires them up, musically and vocally speaking. This coach (female) is massively into RnB, soul, etc. THAT’S their bag. People should be going to them, not necessarily to polish their technique on a foundational level, but because this coach gets most fired up about styling the voice in the way that they & their students want.

This is awesome. I love this. It shows an understanding of who they are, and (most importantly) WHY they do what they do.

And it got me thinking, at least from a style point of view, why do I do what I do? Musically and vocally.

Well, once about a time, I was a bassist and guitarist, and I was heavily into jazz, some of it fairly advanced. I got stuck into virtuoso musicians and, in trying to cop what they were doing, I went out and learned how to do some pretty darn complicated things. I loved it… or at least, I think I loved it… truth be told, I can’t really remember whether I ACTUALLY loved the sounds I was making – i.e. I was making sounds that I genuinely thought sounded good – or whether I loved the feeling of doing something complicated – i.e. I was making sounds that I thought sounded impressive.

And it’s that question that’s driven me over the last few years. Am I doing something because it SOUNDS good, or because I think it’s impressive? Singing with simplicity forces you to confront that question head on.

Don’t get me wrong, the two are not mutually exclusive… but it’s an interesting question isn’t it?

And when you drill down into it, there’s also a fundamental difference in what each says about you. Choosing to do something because it sounds good is about delivering OTHERS a great sound, but doing something because it’s impressive says more about your need to impress others – again, not that either are necessarily mutually exclusive or that impressing others is a bad thing, but these are definitely some powerful thought experiments for musicians to play with, and these are the outcomes I’ve reached over the years

So where does that leave me with my voice and my kind of music?

Well, the realisation that simplicity and quality go hand in hand has been huge – singing with simplicity is the crystallisation of this. It’s made me realise there is real power in simplicity. Immense power, in fact. Just singing the melody (like my blog article ‘The importance of singing the damn melody’) and committing 100% to delivering it beautifully is HUGE. It can raise the hairs on the back of people’s necks without ever breaking a sweat, and without having to do insane vocal acrobatics.

In short, I’m a big believer that if your technique is solid (and I mean REALLY solid), utilisation of range, riffs, power, etc, they all get recruited pretty naturally as a way to support the quality of your voice. I’m not even saying “sound good first, style second”, I’d go so far as to say “sound good first, and you will FIND your style through that”… in essence, style becomes a natural by-product and outworking of great technique.

This is not to say that other teachers who start with style are necessarily wrong (though there are definitely coaches out there who ONLY know how to style, and not to train a voice), nor that style should never be looked at directly/explicitly… rather, that the above thought experiments and my own personality have led me to the working conclusion that simplicity is incredibly powerful, and that this musically trumps complexity every time.

Open Strings and The Voice

Today I want to talk about open strings and the voice… but first, I want to ask you…

Have you ever heard country music?

A vast swathe of country music – both vintage and modern – is guitar driven. And a lot of the great players (Brad Paisley, Brent Mason, etc) define the sound of guitar. If you’ve never heard some of these guys, go check em out.

Why Country Music?
Well, within country music there are a number of idiosyncratic riffs and sounds (i.e. signature sounds) that we recognise as being distinctly “country” sounding. One of the things that is responsible for this is the use of the “open strings” of a guitar.

What are open strings?
Open strings are strings that are just plucked by the player without them pressing the string down on any one fret, i.e. the strings are essentially just plucked and left to vibrate. This allows country players to do quite complicated sounding riffs that are essentially switching quickly from a fretted note (i.e, pressing the string) to an open note (i.e. not pressing the string). Good players use this to create flurries of notes that sound impossible… but are actually relatively straight-forward because of the way the instrument is tuned and built…

NOTE: The reason the above bits are in bold is because this is EXTREMELY relevant to the rest of this article

Here’s the rub…
While I’ve just said what sounds impossible is relatively straightforward to do, this is really only true within the keys that just happen to share those open strings… As such, if you try and pull off that complicated sounding riff in ANOTHER key that DOESN’T use those open strings… my oh my you are in for a world of pain. Essentially what once sounded impossible but is in fact easy, then ACTUALLY becomes impossible/near-impossible, because you are no longer able to switch easily from a fretted note to an unfretted note… you’re having to fret EVERYTHING…

Trust me when I say that clever utilisation of open strings is a feature of guitars that makes certain kinds of riffs only really possible in certain keys for given instruments, because of the way it’s tuned and how it uses certain strings.

Why do I bring this up?

Because the voice is verrry similar.

Certain melodies, riffs and musical ideas will seem very easy in some keys (relative to your bridges, i.e. the way your voice is built), and seem impossible in other keys… and the intervals and the melody itself hasn’t changed (other than key).

And still further, just changing the key by one semitone will close down some opportunities, and open up other avenues of possibility for the melody/riffing, etc. It’s a constant balancing act.

Why is this?

Well, it’s very similar to the guitar analogy.

If you choose to work WITH the instrument, i.e. take advantage of it’s little idiosyncrasies, taking care to understand and go WITH those qualities rather than work against them, then you will find things a LOT easier… and seemingly impossible sounds become easy enough to pull off. That’s not to say “effortless”, but more natural and co-ordinated (certainly with training).

BUT!! If you INSIST on forcing the voice to do what you intellectually think SHOULD be fine and doable (like insisting that open string guitar riffs should be playable in any key), rather than noticing how things feel and what your voice is telling you will work, then you will find yourself extremely frustrated. This is very much the amateur/non-singer approach, who just tries to wrangle the voice into submission, rather than recognising it’s an instrument in it’s own right… I can say this with a tinge of embarrassment because I definitely USED to be one of those singers.

There’s a lot above to take in, so here’s the take-home message.

“Work WITH your voice, not against it”

Remember that keys matter, and your voice is an instrument that needs to be respected and understood in the way you must learn and understand any other instrument. Above all, don’t force things to happen when you can clearly hear they aren’t.

Have an experiment, and have a ponder! I hope you’ll find something new and useful come out of this, and that you’ll start to hear the quality in your voice increase as a result.

Making Priorities: 4 Steps to Big Changes

Making priorities: we all suck at it, and here’s why

Firstly, I owe you all an apology. It’s been verrry quiet on my blog in the last 2 months.

Why? Because my wife (Sarah) and I had our very first child in that time. Our beautiful daughter Isla was born on May 3, 2014, 9 lbs 15 oz, and she is an utter dreamboat.

Isla and Sarah

Secondly, I want to say that… frankly, I’m not sorry at all. Why? Because of today’s topic: priorities.

I want every single one of you to feel the POWER that having priorities has on your life and your productivity and view your life and activities differently.

We made this decision a long time ago…

My wife and I knew we wanted kids from when we started dating. We discussed it and knew it was something we both wanted for the future. We kept discussing it every so often to decide whether we wanted to take action now or later. Eventually, we decided in late 2012 that in 2013 we were to move towards having kids. We knew we were officially pregnant from August 2013. This resulted in our daughter Isla being born in May of 2014. And now our priority is to spend as much time as possible together with Isla. It’s that simple. So I’ve taken a lot of time off to look after Sarah recovering from labour, and I’ve taken extra holiday time within the first 8 weeks just to spend time with them both.

It’s because of this, I haven’t got round to doing a recent blog post. And I ain’t even remotely sorry, because I made my family a priority and this COMPLETELY changes and defines my daily activities.

Are you wasting your time?

How many times do we keep getting dragged into activities that are not congruent with our life goals? The student that has an exam that allegedly matters to them, yet you spend their days procrastinating and their evenings at parties. The lawyer that says their family matters yet they work long hours and nights away for the sake of supporting their family, yet they are never around. The musician that insists music is their passion but they are constantly out socialising and never practicing.

Do you see how their actions are totally incongruent with their alleged goals? It’s easy to laugh it off, but when you consider how far they are away from their goals and how easy it is to go nowhere fast, it’s not that amusing… and when you realise that every single one of us is doing stuff that is actually STOPPING US FROM ACHIEVING OUR PRIORITIES, it suddenly stops being a laughing matter.

What are your priorities?

Step 1: THE QUALITATIVE Consider the qualitative goals and priorities you have for your life. What stuff are you looking to achieve? Write them down. Seriously write them down!

Step 2: THE QUANTITATIVE Now, if those are your priorities, what activities MUST you be doing in a week to ensure you achieve them (e.g. if you’re a musician, PRACTICE and STUDY should be a regular and essential part of your week… otherwise you’re just kidding yourself). Write them down. Seriously, write those bloody things down!

Step 3: THE IMPLEMENTATION Put these activities in your diary. If you don’t put them in the diary, they won’t get done. Simple as that. If you put those activities in your diary, and give the most important activities the best parts of your day, you will start to see BIG results and changes in the areas you want to change. If you don’t, you won’t. Again, it’s that simple.

Step 4: THE PRUNING Theoretically this is optional, but in reality it’s essential. Look at your existing diary, and consider what you are doing that is getting in the way of your goals. E.g. If you’re a workaholic, staying late at the office is not congruent to a good family life. Just factoring in 1 hour on a Saturday morning won’t be enough. So find out what is getting in the way, and cross it out of your diary.

When you go through this process of focusing on your priorities, and making sure your behaviour and daily activities are 100% in line with those goals, you will start to see BIG changes… and you’ll also feel totally unashamed and unapologetic (like the top of the blog post!) when you spend your time moving towards your goals.

Stop wasting your time and start seeing your priorities become a reality…

This was meant to be a fun post but with a simultaneously serious exercise for all of you here today. I seriously hope you can see the power in reassessing your daily activities, and really making whatever your goals are your #1 priority.

Best of luck!

Conquer Stage Fright

Do you want to conquer stage fright when singing or performing generally?

So, I was having a chat with a fab student of mine on Friday night about how to conquer stage fright. Despite having a sickeningly good voice, and performing regularly, they still find the nerves knock them off balance whenever they perform – so, how to conquer stage fright is the question to answer! I have also been chatting over Twitter with one or two people who find then same problem. Sometimes it’s mild nerves, sometimes it outright destroys performances.

While chatting with my student in their lesson about this, I explained my approach to being on stage and dealing with stagefright.

Most people, when they speak to amateur performers or people who do public speaking a reasonable amount, about how to get over stage fright, they often tell them ‘look over their heads’, or ‘imagine them naked’, or ‘pretend they’re not there’… but I think that approach is flawed. In my opinion, the whole issue of stage fright stems from an overawareness of one-self. It stems from being way too aware of how one looks and sounds on stage. And by doing all of the above it reflects an inward acceptance that you look stupid on stage (which isn’t true!), and only buys into that mindset even further. This approach doesn’t dissolve the issue of stage-fright, it actually makes it MORE concrete, but tries to ‘deal with it’ by placing this imaginary stage-fright demon character on the sideline.

Instead, I advocate changing the focus. I advocate changing the focus not AWAY from the audience, but specifically focusing ON the audience. Yep, you read that right.

Focus ON the audience to conquer stage fright.

Follow me if you will.

When people go to watch a performance, they think they are there to watch the performer – i.e. this places the performer as the ‘subject’ of this situation. They will watch the performer sing, dance, jump around on stage, and they will watch eagerly for the stuff you do, and the audience will think that’s what they are there to do… and the performer thinks that is what the audience is there to do. The audience has specifically turned up to scrutinise your every move and observe every mistake you make *cue hyperventilation*

Well let me tell you, this is 100%…

WRONG

This sounds petrifying! Til you realise this is WRONG and is not what’s really going on.

Yes, the audience is watching you, but it is not what the true situation is. The watching of you stems from what the true situation is. The audience watches you, because THEY are the ones who are there to be entertained. They are not there just to watch someone, they are there to be entertained and ultimately ENGAGED by you.

Wait a minute…

…if they are there to be engaged by you, then that means THE AUDIENCE is the subject in this situation. They are the stars of the show! They have turned up wanting to be charmed, won over, entertained, brought up and brought down. It is not their job to watch you, it is YOUR job to entertain them.

How do you entertain someone? Well, unless you are a hermit, you’ve all had conversations with people, and you can probably remember some great conversations you’ve had with friends and family members.

Whenever you have a chat with someone, you naturally try to talk about topics you have in common, and you exchange lines of conversation with them. When you are in a group, you organically take turns to speak, you make eye contact, your tone rises and falls, topics change and the people you look at change depending on the conversation at hand. These are simple social tools you can use and weave into the way you perform songs in order to focus on and engage with an audience. Treat them like they are the participants in a musical conversation. Of course, you are doing most of the talking, but you know in any conversation when someone is bored and when you need to change your tone or topic of conversation.

How much do you hate it when people can’t look you in the eye when they talk to you? Or when you are talking to them and they keep checking their phone? Or when people zone out because they don’t understand what you’re saying. Don’t let the audience do these things, and certainly don’t do these things yourself when performing. These are the goals to focus on, because when you’re doing all these things, you don’t have the TIME to focus on yourself.

Simple tips:
1) Make eye contact with the audience – your goal is to hold their gaze
2) Address whole sentences and thoughts in the lyrics to specific audience sections – your goal is to make them understand what you’re saying
3) Treat it like you are telling a story in front of a group – your goal is to hold their attention

THIS is observing the rules for enjoyable social interaction nature when it comes to human nature, and you can capitalise on this when on stage.

Remember, although they are watching you, they are the real stars of show. If you focus on the audience in the same way as you would when holding a conversation with someone, focus ON them and make sure they are looking at you, then your focus CANNOT be on yourself. When you make your objective to hold people’s attention, the focus on yourself very quickly abates. By changing the focus, you completely castrate and neuter the power that stage fright stems from. By focusing on the audience, they focus on you, without ‘you’ having to focus on ‘you’!

The audience is the subject, and they are the star of the show. By focusing on the audience and being so tunnel-visioned on engaging them, you don’t worry about yourself. In doing so, you make them focus on you, and engage with you, which makes your performance all the more compelling.

One Man’s Take on the Psychology of Singing – Part 2

So, when it comes to the psychology of singing, we have the emotionally over-sensitive camp, and the emotionally insensitive camp.

I’ve already highlighted that we need a balance, so where does the balance lie?

Here’s my take:

The problem with the over-sensitive camp is that it takes responsibility away from the singer, and stuff doesn’t get done – right?

And the problem with the insensitive camp is that it’s not respectful of how emotions affect our voices – right?

So here’s my advice and where I think the balance lies:

Be respectful of the fact that your emotions affect your voice… and sing anyway.

If you fall prey to the whole ‘my emotions hold the key, so I gotta solve them’ camp mentality, then you will go round and round and round in circles trying to fix an issue that may not even have an answer! And all the while you’re not actually singing, let alone enjoy singing and getting better at it.

If you fall prey to the whole ‘my emotions are my weakness, gotta ignore them’ you’ll end up just as frustrated… or worse, not even ENJOY singing because you’ve taken the joy out of it! Don’t do either of these things.

Respect and appreciate your emotions are always going to be a part of your voice… AND SING ANYWAY!

How do you do this?

Simple – set aside 20 minutes every other day or even just once a week just to sing through your favourite songs in their entirety.

Don’t second guess yourself while you’re doing it, don’t stop yourself, just keep going. Don’t try to work out whether you sound awful, or better or worse than last time, just do it, and enjoy it.

What?! Why should I do this? Why do you think I should ignore trying to figure out the ‘why’ behind my emotional state?

Because I don’t think worrying about the why will ACTUALLY benefit you in the long wrong (plenty of studies out there on the misapplication of worry). Like my blog article on the Quickest Route to Your Goal, I think there is a far quicker and more practically applied route to enjoying singing and unlocking the clamp that your emotions have on your voice. And I’ve got science to back me up! (that’s right! actual science!).

Scientific studies are plastered all over our newspaper and news sites week after week about the physical benefits of singing on our minds, how it releases endorphins that make us feel good (the same way exercise does), how it reinforces new neural pathways in our brains and can even rewire the brain. This stuff happens whether you want it to or not – it’s a biological response to the act of singing (in particular singing in groups).

So if you’re feeling down, and you start singing, you’ll release endorphins and feel better. If you do this regularly you’ll start to reinforce this behaviour in your mind and body and associate singing with feeling good. Speaking from my own experience, this can really alter your whole outlook on life and result in you being mentally empowered to actually change the circumstances that you earlier believed were holding you back from singing.

Just. Sing.

The take-home message I want you to absorb is this: just sing.

Stop over-analysing why the mess you find yourself in today is affecting your ability to hit that particular high note with power and clarity. Stop second guessing yourself or thinking that you’ve got to fix your life to fix your voice. It’s a tension we all have to live with. If we want to be better singers we need to take control of our voices, and simultaneously have fun with them.

Respect the fact that your emotions affect your voice… and sing anyway.

RETURN TO PART 1

Mark JW Graham LogoWant our FREE 'Singing 101' Vocal Prospectus?