Shouting Masquerading As Singing: Reasons why so many singers are just yelling

DISCLAIMER: This article is not simply going to be another example of an old man yelling at a cloud.

It’s also not going to be a discussion around me staring into the middle distance and yearning for the “good ol’ days“.

But I will put it bluntly

There is an epidemic of shouting masquerading as singing, at least to my mind and my ear. And today I want to talk about why.

Over the years

To begin with, I’ve lost count of the number of events where every singer was just yelling their guts out. I’ve even seen singers step away from the microphone to show how loudly they can bellow their lyrics—it’s part of their performance piece. I’ve seen performers get gigs for not much more reason than they can belt notes louder than their peers. I’ve even been singing as part of a group, where when someone starts yelling their part, people think that equates to a more emotional performance.

What exactly is causing this? And what are the highest quality singers actually doing that sets them apart from some that might be accused of yelling?

Before we judge such singers too harshly…

… are there reasons behind why many resort to yelling? Are there tripwires that cause some singers to miss out on the path to higher quality?

I’m not for a second looking to justify or exonerate bad singing, but I also want to be clear that the voice has its complications. It would therefore be remiss to not discuss some of the physiological factors at play in this trend.

What do I mean by ‘yelling‘?

When you hear someone shouting across a room to get someone’s attention, or yelling at a football match, or bellowing an order to a subordinate, this is yelling. We all intuitively know the sound, both having heard others yell, and having felt it in our own bodies when we’ve done the same.

NOTE: As a very quick prima facie argument against yelling of any kind as a valid foundation for singing, ask yourself: how long do you feel you can keep up any of the above activities before your voice would give out or hurt? How long could you continuously yell as if at a football match before your voice goes hoarse or you feel pain?

Now ask yourself: if you were trying to vocally perform for hours every night, how sustainable would this approach be? Maybe for the odd 10–20 minute set once a month you could get away with it, but it’s far from an optimal or commendable approach.

I trust you now grasp just how unsustainable it is to approach singing like it was all about forcing one’s way to the top notes.

How does this happen?

When someone yells, what is going on mechanically is best described as a megaphone-type structure. The vocal folds at the laryngeal level generate sound, and the vocal tract is wide-open and relatively disengaged. This creates an effect like someone speaking into the narrow end of the cone of a megaphone.

Think back to the last time you heard someone whose singing could be described as shouty. You may have noticed that such singers are not yelling every note. Instead, this shouty quality tends to creep into people’s voices the higher they wish to sing.

This shouty quality typically progresses fairly rapidly as soon as the singer encounters difficulty with singing higher. The phenomenon is highly vowel dependent. Sometimes it is a binary switch, but generally this quality creeps in gradually.

Why does this happen? Why do singers opt for this approach?

As we sing higher, we need higher and higher subglottal air pressure to sustain the note. This increases the air pressure in the vocal tract.

This higher air pressure also acts upon the vocal tract. For less skilled singers, it is hard to know what to do with this sensation. They feel pressure inside their throat and typically experience a physiological response to want to release it.

There is also the tendency of singers to apply excessive force to reach higher notes, even beyond the necessary increase. To sing higher notes well requires fine motor control of the larynx and vocal folds, independently of air pressure. But singers who do not yet have this control tend to apply extraordinarily excessive air pressure to literally force the larynx to tilt.

To the inexperienced singer, they have two options to alleviate this sensation of pressure:

1) Open the vocal tract (megaphone/yelling) — dumps the extra pressure. This initially produces a loud sound but is unsustainable and inefficient.

2) Drop the volume — reduces air pressure across the system. This typically shifts the sound into a lighter head voice/falsetto quality.

In both cases, the singer diverges from their previous approach and from the vocal quality they had been delivering.

In option 1, the vocals become shouty and bellowed (think Idina Menzel – Frozen). In option 2, the vocals suddenly become light (think Sam Smith – Lay Me Down).

So what is the solution?

As it happens, there is a third option, but it isn’t necessarily obvious.

3) Keep the vowel the same, and keep the volume the same.

Start with the correct vowel and a consistent volume, and learn to stay the course. To the inexperienced singer, this can seem like an impossible knife-edge of control.

This means NO yelling. No going light. No bailing out to options 1 or 2. We aim to keep everything controlled as we move higher—controlled, but without tightness or force. This is the third option.

It’s what you hear when you hear most great classical singers, and the best pop singers (Stevie Wonder, Peabo Bryson, etc).

Sidenote: When I say vowel and volume remain “the same”, I’m being imprecise. Subtle vowel modification is required, but the key point is maintaining congruence so the listener perceives no tonal shift.

Conclusion: There are genuine reasons people yell

The physiological difficulties of singing tend to push people toward option 1 or 2 as the easy way out. It’s like lifting a heavy object with poor form: the body chooses a damaging shortcut.

This third option requires significant co-ordination and practice. The higher we sing, the more air-pressure and vocal fold control must be mastered. The higher and more controlled we wish to be, the more precise the instrument must become.

This is fundamentally a high-level skillset. Few people invest the time; most take the short road, even if it’s a short one.

If after reading this, you feel like you are falling prey to this and would like help resolving these issues in your voice, you can book in to work with me below.

Learning to Riff: Why most people find it hard & why it can be easier than you think

I was having a conversation with a client recently about riffing: what it is, why it’s useful, and why it seems difficult to many.

For the ease of discussion let’s say that anything that extends the melody beyond the original for dramatic/musical effect is a ‘riff’, and that riffing is therefore the act of extending the melody in such a way.

I’d say that most singers want to get better at riffs/riffing, but that they find it hard to do. I’d also say that a lot of singers who think they are good at riffing are not as good as they think they are, and typically repeat the same old basic tricks over and over. But why is it hard to do? And could it be made easier?

The simple answer is yes, but there’s some important logic and understanding behind that answer. Let’s break it down. Continue reading “Learning to Riff: Why most people find it hard & why it can be easier than you think”

Pavarotti on training your voice: What they don’t tell you about singing

Pavarotti’s Take on Vocal Training

Luciano Pavarotti famously said it took him six years to master his voice, even with natural ability. Here’s what we can learn from him:

  • Passaggio Mastery: Navigating register transitions takes time, especially in classical styles.
  • Persistence Pays Off: Pavarotti honed his craft with unwavering discipline over years.
  • Avoiding Shortcuts: Consistency beats gimmicks — real vocal progress demands commitment.

For more training insights, check out Jason Alexander on the creative process.

You can also read about Pavarotti’s early struggles in this retrospective from The Guardian.

This article forms part of our Pavarotti collection. Click here to dive deeper.

So one great singer said to another…

The bass Jerome Hines once interviewed the tenor Luciano Pavarotti on training your voice, and this was his response:

“Now this passaggio… is the transition from the upper middle voice to the high voice, and I know that students are interested in your approach since you have such a flawless passaggio; it is so smooth a change one is not aware of it”

Pavarotti replied:

“It took me six years of study… and one must be convinced of it’s importance from the first day… never change ideas. You know, the first five or six months it is very depressing because it does not come out right, and you become cyanotic, red in the face.

Then some students begin to think this approach is wrong, and they try the other way, but it will never bring them security of voice.”*

* – Extract from page 218 of Jerome Hines, “Great Singers on Great Singing” (click for the Amazon link)

Context: Pavarotti didn’t start voice training til he was 18/19. He also had a voice that could sail effortlessly up to an Eb5 even post puberty, and not a weak light sound, but a connected sound. Make no mistake, he was gifted with an instrument that makes singing easy and beautiful in a way that most of us couldn’t grasp… even before training.

AND EVEN THEN, he makes the above statement of how long it took to train his voice the correct way, of how FRUSTRATING it is was to train his voice properly, and how he saw (and perhaps related?) to those who doubt the process.

So what don’t you get told about singing?

Simply, you do not become a good to great singer in a handful of lessons, or even a year or two. It seems from various sources that it took Pavarotti a minimum of six years as he continued to develop his voice daily. Most crucially he was known to turn away roles he felt vocally not yet ready for.

This is even though his range (even pre-training!) was ALREADY covering every possible piece of repertoire he would ever be asked to sing. It’s not about range or just the “mere” ability to hit the notes, it was about security of voice and quality of tone, and he knew that.

Great and complete singers don’t just get “discovered” with zero to minimal training any more than polished and beautifully cut diamonds just get “found” in a coal mine – it takes work, even in the case of voices with great base materials like Pavarotti’s voice.

So remember: if it took the gifted but young Pavarotti a minimum of 6 years to train his voice properly, we MUST understand this. That true and full development of the voice takes concerted, intentional, focused effort sustained over a period of years to achieve the kind of voice you can throw whatever you like at.

If this is something you’d like to discover in your own voice, I’d love to start work with you. You can book yourself in via the booking button below.

Five More Songs from the Last Week

I had a load of positive feedback last time I posted a feature on five songs from the last week, so here we are again with another instalment!

1. Salley Gardens
A solid folk tune, this was brought in this week by a fab student whose voice has REALLY come on in the last few months. There are many versions, but this is one that I quite enjoy!

2. Christina Perri – Jar of Hearts
This was brought in at the end of the week by a local performer. Whilst too high in the original key for their particular voice, this stuck in my head for the rest of the day.

3. Demi Lovato – Skyscraper
This is an oft-talked about song by students but only a few bring it in to work on. This particular song requires quite an attitude to deliver just right, even with technique being under your belt!

4. Sting – If I Ever Lose My Faith
I am a moderate fan of Sting. I really enjoy certain pieces but there’s a large number of tracks I just don’t gel with. This one crossed my ears again via a cover someone had done on Facebook, and when I mentioned it in front of a student later in the week they jumped on the chance to give it a whirl!

5. Matt Redman – 10,000 Reasons
I work with a fair few church singers and worship leaders (if you’re not sure what this job is, it’s a kind of band leader and functional lead singer for modern church congregations), and it so happens that this track is a fairly common song to hear at modern churches these day by a writer of MANY modern hymn classics. It’s got a somewhat tricky ascent in the chorus, and is tough to nail with quality (given the ballad speed it goes it) without just yelling (as many leaders tend to do!).

Five Songs You Should Hear – John Mayer and Bonnie Raitt

I ended up having a fairly long Facebook chat with a few students today on a variety of songs, and five songs came up that I recommended they have a listen to… and they just hadn’t heard them before! So I figured I’d share the five right here for your listening pleasure!

#1 – Bonnie Raitt – I Can’t Make You Love Me

Some of you will have seen me blog about it before, but it’s excellent and WELL worth checking out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmK1H6EXUYs

#2 – Bonnie Raitt – Thing Called Love

This one is awesome. She’s a great slide guitar player. And Bruce Hornsby is a mean accordion player.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shnHm8D-XRk

#3 – John Mayer & Keith Urban – Sweet Thing

I’m a big fan of John Mayer, not necessarily the most technical (or even safe singer, given his ongoing vocal health issues), but MAN he can sell a song like very few others.

#4 – John Mayer & Keith Urban – Til Summer Comes Around

I did this song a LOT with a client a year or two ago, and it really suited their voice. A really moody anthemic song, great melodic hooks throughout.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmvbjkH5RgI

#5 – John Mayer – Free Fallin’

Save the best til last… just an awesome tune done so well by Mr Mayer.

Formants In Singing – What on earth are they?

So, let’s talk about Formants in Singing…

While I’ve taken a break from coaching and working on my own voice in general over the Christmas holiday (boy was that a good rest!), I’ve been doing quite a bit of reading on formants in singing. If any of you have any interest in voice science, I can thoroughly recommend Kenneth W. Bozeman’s ‘Practical Vocal Acoustics’. This is a helpful book covering the science of the voice from the perspective of the TEACHER and the singer, rather than purely from a voice scientist’s perspective. It’s this book that I’ll be drawing on for today’s explanation.

One of the things that keeps cropping up in my ol’ noggin is how critical the first bridge is… why? Because it’s crossing this portion of the voice that enables access to the rest of the voice… therefore, pretty important!

For many of us, we may accept that there IS this magical mysterious thing called a “bridge” or “passagi”, or as Kenneth W. Bozeman puts it, “where the voice turns over”… but…

What exactly is the first bridge?

Let’s discuss this. To do that we need to do a very quick (and very coarse) anatomy lesson.

The voice as an instrument consists of two parts:

1) the vocal cords; and

2) the vocal tract (the airway tube between your vocal cords and your lips)

The vocal cords

The vocal cords generate sound (acting as a source of sound), the vocal tract shapes the sound (filter). From here on in, please do me a favour – think of the vocal tract like a plastic water bottle, the squishable kind you can buy from any corner store.

The vocal tract

Have you ever blown across the top of a bottle that isn’t completely full? Have you ever noticed that the bottle has a particular pitch that it seems to generate? This is called resonance. Empty volumes (like plastic bottles) have distinct frequencies that they vibrate at when excited (e.g. by blowing across the top of it). You can spot the same effect by banging the side of a long cardboard poster tube and notice the pitch of the noise it emits, or even by humming down the length of that tube. These pitches are referred to as “formants”, and are a by-product of the fact that empty volumes exhibit resonance at particular frequencies.

NOTE: You don’t need to remember all this per se, I merely mention it so you respect the idea that empty volumes have an associated pitch they like to vibrate it, and that these pitches are called formants.

Now, let’s continue the analogy. If you change the shape of the empty volume inside the bottle (e.g. by squeezing it or adding some water in/taking some water out), then blowing across it, the associated pitches it wants to vibrate it (the formants) will have changed. The same effect can be achieved by cutting that long cardboard poster tube to a different length, then banging it again. The change in shape affects the resonance, which in turn affects the formants.

HALFWAY SUMMARY:
– The vocal cords generate specific frequencies (the singer’s pitch)
– The vocal tract resonates at specific frequencies (the formant(s) of the instrument)

In short, despite the chief difference where the cords generate the frequencies whilst the tract doesn’t actually generate those frequencies, both the vocal cords and the vocal tract possess their own particular sets of frequencies that are associated with them.

It’s the interaction between these two sets of specific frequencies that is an important phenomenon for singing.

Here’s the low-down…

The first bridge occurs when a certain frequency generated by the vocal cords happens to pass through a certain corresponding frequency of the vocal tract (a specific formant)*.

As you can see, this makes the whole concept of the first bridge *relatively* straight-forward to understand, but also results in the realisation that it’s a REEEEEEALLY complicated thing to get sorted in singers. If the first bridge happens as two frequencies cross each other, then what happens if they both start changing together? What happens if one suddenly changes during the process?

It’s a complicated system… it’s dependent on the pitch/frequency of the voice, the pitch that the vocal tract wants to vibrate it, which in turn is dependent on the shape of the vocal tract, but is also affected by the volume of the singer (as this affects excitation of the vocal tract).

*Deep breath*

Don’t panic.

This is all completely trainable, and completely manageable… but it takes more than just good exercises. It requires (in my opinion) a structured and logical approach to applying those exercises, so that singers are not constantly hyper-aware of bridges and essentially trying to control a million things at once all whilst trying to sing with emotion, but instead builds the required co-ordination into muscle memory, to thereby make easy connected singing automatic.

So… now you know where the first bridge comes from… What’s stopping you?

* – Specifically, when the second harmonic (H2) generated by the vocal cords passes through the first formant (F1) of the vocal tract. You DON’T need to remember this to be a great singer.

Luciano Pavarotti Caro Mio Ben

Yesterday I had a conversation with a foreign student who is currently working with me on their voice, who did not know who Pavarotti was. While this seems unthinkable to many of us here in Britain, I can completely understand how those growing up overseas may well never have heard this incredible voice.

Pavarotti was a monster vocalist, not just of his generation, but in the over-arching story of great singers of the ages. He had an incredible voice, one with great agility and range, but also power and tenderness to boot. What is important to remember is that he also had to put a lot of work into his voice… it just goes to show how even gifted singers need to work on their voice. Good can become great in this way!

Check out this beautiful piece, Luciano Pavarotti Caro Mio Ben…

Luciano Pavarotti Caro Mio Ben

Mark JW Graham LogoWant our FREE 'Singing 101' Vocal Prospectus?