Rock singers who have lost it (perhaps)

Last time we looked at rock singers who, even post- 70 years old, and still rocking as hard as they did back in the day.

This week, I thought it would be worth showing some singers that maybe aren’t faring so well with age.

DISCLAIMER:

We are all human, and all prone to mistakes. Every singer singing live knows there are better gigs than others, and voices can do better some days and worse on other days. The primary reason for sharing these live clips (and all of them are live) are to show just how unforgiving age can be if your technique isn’t good enough.

As we age, things change with our voice. With a well-trained voice we should peak in late 40s/early 50s… but the very same physiological changes that enable that peak in trained voices, are the very things that can derail voices without the right training. Even with voices doing 90% of things right, that 10% wrong can still be too much to keep delivering a high demand style of singing, like rock.

Therefore, the purpose of the following videos is to help those of you reading and listening to appreciate just how tough it is to keep delivering these high-demand songs into later years. It’s entirely doable (per my earlier article), but it’s important to note that even incredible voices can get derailed.

That said, brace yourselves

Whew! OK, now that the disclaimer is over, you may want to prepare yourselves to hear some less than stellar performances below. Continue reading “Rock singers who have lost it (perhaps)”

Rock Singers Who Still Have It

Someone asked me this week which rock singers from the 70s/80s are still doing well vocally. Great question, and also a great talking point!

There’s plenty of singers who sounded incredible back in their youth, who have no useable voice left now due to damage and abuse. I’m sure we can all think of some singers whose voices are totally shot.

There are singers now who weren’t perfect back in their youth but who are still somehow still able to keep going despite them vocally breaking all the rules. These singers generally have what we refer to as “vocal folds of steel”, where there is no reason they should still be singing when they are being so damaging and aggressive to their voices, and yet… they’re still going.

And then there’s singers who are intense and powerful, and they are still pretty on-the-money technically.

I’m going to cover three of my favourite singers in the latter two categories:

Sammy Hagar

Sammy Hagar was one of the lead singer’s of Van Halen. He has one of the most insane rock voices I’ve ever heard… and he’s still going even now at 75 years old (same age as Stallone).

Here is one of Van Halen’s tracks from the 80s, ‘Why Can’t This Be Love?’, both from the album, then recorded in the studio on the Howard Stern show a few years ago.

Notice that the second track is slightly lower (by a whole tone) but he is still rocking it. It’s not like he’s singing it down the octave. He is still delivering the goods despite nearly 4 decades having elapsed. His technique is not perfect, but he is still doing enough right to keep going the way he is. Continue reading “Rock Singers Who Still Have It”

Why Taking a Rest Day Helps

I was chatting with a client this week about taking a rest day for your voice, i.e., days we don’t work on our voices or do singing of any kind.

To be honest, I work on my voice near enough every day. I’m a practice-a-holic. But there is still HUGE power in taking days off on a consistent basis. I actually schedule them in each week, such that I have to opt out of them rather than opt in.

As such, I want to talk about three reasons it’s worth taking vocal rest days.

Preface

Working on your voice for vocal development is like going to the gym. Turning up consistently is worth more than doing several long sets sporadically. However, gym-work and lifting weights is about causing microscopic damage to your muscles, such that your body repairs those holes and build muscle. With voice training we are not seeking this. We are aiming to smoothly co-ordinate our voices better, with as little excess tension as possible, or wear-and-tear due to imprecise/inefficient behaviour.

If you are working on your voice in a consistent, sustainable and healthy way, you SHOULD be able to practice every day with little to no ill-effects. Nevertheless, rest days are important for the following reasons. Continue reading “Why Taking a Rest Day Helps”

How Does Your Voice Change As We Get Older

How DOES your voice change over time? As a vocal coach and singing teacher, I’ve taught well over a thousand voices over the years. Some of those voices I’ve taught for 12-15 years. As such, I’ve got a lot of first-hand experience of dealing not just with voices of all ages, but working with singers AS their voices change across the years. In this article I want to talk about how voices change, mature, and perhaps even struggle as they get older… and why that happens.

I was recently chatting to some more mature singers in my Nottingham vocal coaching studio, who were struggling with their voices and wanted to know how voices change as we get older. I mentioned this is fairly typical for untrained voices, and these were the varying responses…

“What exactly happens to your voice as you get older?

I used to be able to sing pretty high with a strong voice when I was younger…

But now, it feels like I sing much lower, maybe an octave lower, and it’s much weaker than I remember.”

This is actually a fairly accurate (albeit abridged) experience of what happens to voices that do not receive help as they age. As they asked, I explained what happens and why, and I thought it was worth discussing that here. Whether you are in your teens, over sixty, or somewhere in between, it is really helpful to know how the voice changes as we age, and what tends to happen along the way.

If you feel you are struggling with this issue in your voice, I’d love to help you resolve those issues and rediscover your love for singing.

Get Expert Help

Teens

Puberty hits. Somewhere between the ages of 12-18, the voice physiologically changes to become the new shape and configuration it will be for the rest of our adult life. The difference is that it is brand new. This new instrument is fresh, but undeveloped in any musical or learning sense – because it is literally brand new.

Such instruments are (generally) free from any previous injuries. The muscles and tissues are generally pretty compliant, though this also leaves them open to obeying instructions that will cause longer term damage to them.

These advantages don’t mean that everyone can sing well when they are young, simply that they can get their voice to do things that older voices might suffer when doing.

Young singers often have the energy and carefree attitude that permits them to attack notes with an intensity that isn’t safe or sustainable. Yet, because of the relative freshness of the instrument, such manipulations can be made to sound less forced than it actually is. In many pop genres, this excessive force and unsustainable manipulation is even considered stylistically desirable by the market at large.

20s

The body keeps developing physiologically until about 25. You see this in the general body shape of post-teens as they ‘fill in’ from 18 to 25. Similarly, the voice will fill in a little bit more, the weight in the voice typically increases a little bit more, etc. However the instrument will typically remain pliable, per the above.

Once a singer gets to about 25-30 though, the development and freshness ‘period’ is at an end. This is when we start to see differences between singers that maybe weren’t apparent when they were just a year or two younger. Issues can start to creep in for those singers whose approach is unsustainable.

Artists that have relied on youthful vigour, or a pugilistic approach to singing will start to encounter more resistance to that attitude of singing. Those who have been reliant on the “freshness” of their post-pubescent instrument generally start to see their voice wane at this stage. Many aren’t even aware they are relying on their youth in this way.

Whereas singers that weren’t forcing their way to higher notes, tend to find they don’t lose quite so much, if anything at all. If anything, such singers tend to find more depth starts to fill into their voice.

30s

Once a singer gets to about 30, a key developmental change starts to occur. Ossification, where cartilage turns to bone. I’ve talked about that in more detail in this article.

“Usually ossification [turning to bone] occurs first in the thyroid cartilage at about 30 years of age and is complete by 65 years. Cricoid cartilage ossifies from behind and forward. Rarely ossification occurs in the epiglottis, cricothyroid ligament, and upper part of the stylohyoid ligament.” 1

Until age 30, the larynx is made of cartilage, which is a relatively rigid but deformable/plastic-like material in our bodies. The same material in our knees and other joints. One can hit notes excessively hard with air pressure not because it’s technically correct, but because the cartilage can act like suspension to absorb an otherwise ‘bumpy’ forceful approach. But once the cartilage starts to turn to bone, this ‘suspension-like’ attribute begins to disappear.

This is usually the key downward turning point for most singers.

This is where singers start to notice how their range is not what it once was, how they struggle to hit notes the way they once did. (Side-note: I can’t help but notice how even the language of ‘hitting’ a note is synonymous with the language of attack or violence).

I say this not purely based on the theoretical ideals, but on empirical evidence also. I personally get a substantial number of professional performers come to see me about age 30, all with issues stemming from this change. The natural maturing of the voice is incompatible with the youthful pugilistic approach of (literally) hitting high notes.

These are generalities of course: I meet singers who start to struggle before they are 30, and some don’t get issues till 35. I’ve even had some hold on to their younger more pliant voice till they are about 40… but most untrained voices tend to follow this trajectory of rapid vocal decline sooner or later.

Yet the best opera singers reach their peak in their 40s.

“Opera singers can stay at their peak for decades with efficient technique, good health, and a suitable repertoire. One reason Pavarotti was able to sing for so long was because he didn’t strain his vocal folds; he delivered songs as easily as if he were conversing, embodying an approach that vocal coaches call ‘Si canta come si parla,’ or ‘Sing as you speak.’2

This same developmental quirk that derails the average singer – where the larynx starts to turn to bone and the voice deepen – is actually the very change we NEED for great singing into later years. I’m not saying opera is the end all and be all, but it is the genre of singing with the greatest preserved history, and the highest demand on the voice technically. Ergo, we would do well to pay heed to the trends within this genre.

Working theory as to why

The working theory is that the rigidity of the larynx provides a solid frame for the vocal folds to operate on. It is also understood that these changes better enable resonance and efficiency of operation of the instrument.

The sad consequence of this change is that some singers will choose to stop singing in this decade of their life. This is especially true for voice professionals, who perhaps find the demands their career places them under outstrips their capacity to deliver. They are “writing cheques their body can no longer cash“.

This tends to be infuriating for artists/performers, as they try ever harder to do the things they used to do, but find they cannot do so. If anything this generally leads to a downward spiral in vocal ability. Vocal confidence then deteriorates alongside.

40s

Once people hit their 40s, in men and women alike, we start to encounter overall physiological decline. This is assuming no intervention or maintenance programme being undertaken by the individual (e.g. gym, diet, treatments, etc). This is where men’s testosterone and muscle mass tends to drop3. Energy levels also decline, as does the body’s ability to recover from injury. On top of this, the likelihood of injury goes up as tissues weaken. There are also similar body and hormonal change issues that women have to contend with4.

This is where personal training to maintain muscle mass, or hormone replacement therapy are modern tools to help combat physiological decline.

Muscles become less supple without the right maintenance and controlled stimulus. The weakening musculature within the voice often starts to cause the untrained voice to thin out tone wise. This is at the same time as the larynx descends with age.

This often leads to a weaker voice also sitting lower in pitch – the worst of both worlds for most singers! Yet, remember that this is the decade that the best singers should be hitting their peak.2

If one is beating their voice up on a regular basis like they once did in their youth, and they didn’t already suffer, this is when they tend to do themselves a mischief (e.g. nodules, granuloma, haemorrhage, etc). Many will stop singing as much as they used to in this decade of their life, simply because they can’t sing like they once did.

A trained voice should be peaking in the 40s-50s

It’s not all doom and gloom in these decades. Far from it. Voices who are doing things correctly should find things are firing on all cylinders in a way they didn’t before. Sure, the body is less capable of handling poor execution of songs (causing damage) but at this stage a skilled singer should never be putting themselves in such a position. The depth and richness to the voice should be partnering well with the range that has been developed in a more mature voice.

50s

This is much a continuation and completion of what was happening in the 40s. Further deepening of the voice due to laryngeal drop, ossification of the larynx drawing to a close, etc. Any bad habits that have been sustained over time will become far more evident in the voice in this decade.

Voices that have got substantially weaker in the 40s can often see a dramatic weakening of the voice (even when speaking in the late 50s), especially if someone does not use their voice regularly in their day to day life or work. Whereas voices that have continued training and acquiring the best traits of their developing voice will typically see continued tonal and functional growth even into this decade.

More extreme hormonal changes in women and in men can also lead to still more severe perceived changes in the voice, but such changes are beyond the scope of this article.

60s

Whilst life obviously continues beyond 60, in terms of vocal development we are drawing to a close in terms of radical changes the voice is going to go through. The larynx now sits much lower than in any earlier decade. Without training or regular correct use the muscles will be the weakest they have ever been, which is why good on-going training makes such a difference to voices in later years.

After the key change in our 30s, this is the next most common age singer I get wanting help with their voice. It’s the combination of muscular weakness, completion of the ossification, and a host of other factors connected partly with age, but also partly lack of tolerance for error left in the instrument. You HAVE to do it right and maintain your voice, or the voice goes downhill fast.

The larynx will be completely bone at this point. The body will be the least compliant or capable of taking any substantial abuse/misuse. This is why correct vocal technique is so important to maintain a healthy voice.

The Take-Home Message

For the developing singer, most of these changes are advantages.

And yet, most of these traits are advantageous to the studious singer, or at least not a problem. The rigid larynx, the deeper laryngeal position for added bottom end, aids in vocal tone and tone production. With regular use there is no reason for substantial muscle wastage (which is why regular exercise is so generally essential for us as we age). With correct vocal technique, we shouldn’t ever really stray into a zone of causing damage.

Once we develop/capture range correctly (I can’t stress that enough), provided we keep accessing it day by day as our voice changes (whatever age we start!), there is no normal functional reason we can’t keep it. If we find we start to lose some of our range, or a certain area feels less comfortable etc, that is generally an indication there is a behavioural issue for us to solve, NOT a technical limitation in the instrument itself.

Perhaps you’re an older singer who is struggling with their voice, or a professional performer who is encountering these issues at your specific age. If any of these issues have struck a chord with you, and you’d like to look at building/rebuilding a voice to be proud of for the rest of your life, then you can book in via my booking form right here.

Source: 1US National Library of Medicine
2Article on Pavarotti and Opera Singers
3Mayo Clinic on Male Menopause and Hormone changes
4Mayo Clinic on Female menopause

Vocal Technique and Vocal Robustness

I regularly have conversations with clients and singers about vocal robustness, i.e. being able to sing for long periods, and for sustained touring schedules.

I’ve written numerous articles on the primary causes why people lose their voice on a regular basis, through overuse, misuse, and abuse. I’ve got a full listing of related articles at the footer of this article.

A lot of people see vocal robustness as something wholly separate to vocal technique. Robustness is somehow “just one of those things“, and technique is something separate, primarily determining range, tone, ability to riff, etc. However, they are not at all separate. Vocal robustness is inherently a by-product of good technique, and here’s why… Continue reading “Vocal Technique and Vocal Robustness”

Five Reasons for Vocal Conservatism

If we ignore any political baggage that comes with the term “conservative“, the root of the phrase “vocal conservatism” is actually very easy to get: it means to conserve.

To conserve means to maintain, to preserve, to keep hold of. And at least from a vocal perspective, I want to keep my voice. I don’t want to sing it ragged, or feel worse for wear. I want it to feel as fresh at the end of singing a setlist, as it did at the start. Ideally, I’d like it to feel better for having sung for an hour or two, rather than feeling worse.

This is perfectly feasible, but it involves taking a far more conservative approach to our voices. Whichever way you lean politically, when it comes to voice, I’m hopeful that the following five reasons will convince you to become a “vocal conservative“. By doing so, your voice, your music, and anyone you choose to sing for will appreciate you all the more for it.

1. Vocal Conservatism = Don’t write cheques your voice can’t cash

How many singers have you seen (either live or heard in a live recording) where they completely fail to deliver the money notes of their best-known songs? Or they change the key so radically that the song loses all the life and zest of what made the original so enjoyable? Or worse, they just come off the microphone and let the crowd have a bash at it.

Maybe you’ve even been that singer, worrying every single time about whether THAT note will come out right.

The studio enables one to stitch together a final version that could never be delivered live. This is a great tool for delivering a polished result, but the real problem with this approach is that now the singer now has to weasel their way out of an unsingable song every time they sing.

For those of us singing originals or covers, we often set the bar too high and add songs to our set list that our voice can’t deliver… or at least consistently enough that we never fret over it. This leads to vocal problems, and a growing complex about whether or not you’ll “make it”. It’s not worth it. Continue reading “Five Reasons for Vocal Conservatism”

Coronavirus, Covid & Singing: How Covid-19 Appears to Affect The Singing Voice

In the last 2-3 months, I’ve worked with a number of clients online and spoken with a number of people who have had coronavirus/Covid-19 (either tested positive for, or strongly suspected to have had). While none of these cases have been hospitalised, all have experienced quite severe upper respiratory symptoms that have lingered for quite some time. In working with these voices, certain patterns are beginning to emerge in relation to how this virus affects the voice. I’ve discussed how different illnesses affect the voice before in this article, but I want to focus on Covid specifically here.

But before we get going…

DISCLAIMER: The following is my anecdotal opinion and should not be considered a definitive medical finding. I am not a medical professional, nor am I seeking to provide medical advice. Anything contained in this article should not be construed as such.

This article is intended as a preliminary discussion on patterns I have noticed in the last 2-3 months in relation to my voice teaching practice, specifically in relation to those who have/are suspected to have contracted coronavirus/Covid-19. I also reserve the right to update this article with any new developments/re-evaluations that are encountered as the situation progresses.

Let’s look at Covid-19 data through the lens of a singer/voice user

Continue reading “Coronavirus, Covid & Singing: How Covid-19 Appears to Affect The Singing Voice”

The Art of Re-Building a Voice

I spend a lot of time working on voices. Often we are building them from the ground-up, teaching the instrument how to behave in a new way. And sometimes it can involve re-building a voice.

This can be slow for voices that are more stubborn, have suffered from health issues, etc. The process can also be surprisingly quick, as voices typically suck up new muscle memory/behaviour patterns when it’s good for them.

The whole process involves training and co-ordinating the vocal folds, the vocal tract, the larynx, and a host of other components.

Intro: Re-building a voice

However, there is a smaller sub-section of people I work with where I am not building their voice for the first time, but re-building their voice.

Here I’m talking about people who previously had a functioning voice – perhaps even a trained one – that have undergone some kind of vocal trauma that has radically shifted how their instrument behaves and operates. This shift is often so severe that the individual barely recognises their voice anymore (psychologically or mechanically/acoustically) and so they are at a loss how to proceed. Continue reading “The Art of Re-Building a Voice”

Mark JW Graham LogoWant our FREE 'Singing 101' Vocal Prospectus?