Why I don’t like falsetto

The topic of ‘falsetto’ comes up a lot in lessons. Questions like “what is it? when should I do it? SHOULD I do it? Where is it useful?”, etc.

I’ve had clients ask me whether I even like it when singers sing in falsetto, as I’ve often given the impression that I don’t. As such, I thought it worth covering here to clarify.

What exactly is falsetto?

Firstly, let’s be precise about what falsetto is, what it isn’t, and then we’ll get into the details on falsetto usage.

When singers sing in true falsetto, their vocal folds are no longer operating normally – or ‘modally’ – like they would when speaking.

When singing or speaking normally, the vocal folds are adducting (coming together) firmly against each other in order to make sense. They are actually contacting one another.

In contrast, when singing in falsetto it’s just the very edges of the mucosal layers of the vocal folds which are loosely flapping against the airflow. It’s more like the vocal folds are roughly hewing the air into a particular pitch.

This sound is extremely light and breathy as a result. And due to there not being any real musculature involved, you generally can’t drive any meaningful volume out of that particular function. True falsetto is therefore limited, both tonally and dynamically.

What falsetto is NOT

Here’s the thing, when MOST people think they are hearing falsetto, what they are actually hearing is very light head voice or even a very light heady mix (the blend between chest and head voice).

Now even though light head voice can sound very similar to falsetto, it is still what we call modal singing, i.e. the vocal folds are contacting with each other like in normal speaking/singing.

When light head voice/mixed voice is done at its very lightest, it can sound aesthetically very similar to falsetto. As a result, people often use the term falsetto – which is a primarily functional definition – to describe a particular quality in a singer’s sound.

It might feel like I’m splitting hairs, but I want to be precise.

The key difference is at the vocal fold level

If the singer is in true falsetto, then they are mechanically disconnected from being able to use their normal voice…

In contrast, a light mix or even just light head voice will deliver a very similar aesthetic, without any gear switching…

A good mix enables a singer to dive into the chestiest low notes as well as to the lightest high notes…

I’m not against that sound/aesthetic

To summarise, I’m not against a voice singing with that lighter quality (ala falsetto) when done appropriately…

I never rule it out, but in the first instance, I train people to deliver the sounds in a smooth and functionally connected way first…

There are several reasons:

Philosophical

At its philosophical core the technique I teach is trying to build a complete and uniform voice…

Dynamic variation to explore lighter sounds is part and parcel of technical development…

Artistic

True artistry is predicated on choice

Nine times out of ten, mixed voice sounds objectively better

Here’s what tends to happen in sessions…

Sure, there’s still 1 time out of every 10 that they prefer the lighter/falsetto sound…

For a singer with a good mix and control of their voice, switching into that sound is relatively easy…

Related reading: What Most Singing Teachers Get Wrong

Feel like you’re stuck singing in falsetto for high notes?

Perhaps you’re someone that has been finding themselves switching constantly for higher notes, or opting for a lighter than desired sound at parts of your range. If that’s something you’d like to improve, I’d love to help you with that.

Book a session now

How long does it take to learn to sing well?

This question gets asked a LOT. In fact, I can see it’s one of THE most searched for terms on the internet. And understandably so… how long DOES it take to learn to sing well?

People have set their sights on improving their voice, and rightly so. They want to know what’s involved, how long it’s going to take, how much time do they need to commit, etc.

Short answer: Most people can make significant improvements in 3 to 6 months with consistent training, while developing a truly polished, confident singing voice typically takes 1–2 years. The key variable is not talent — it’s focused practice, guidance, and how efficiently you train.

Long answer: Of course, I’m sure most reading this will grasp that there isn’t a single definite answer, as the nature of progress in any skill is dependent on many factors. But even accounting for all those “it depends” factors, there is a lot of predictability in the process of training the average voice.

So in this article, I’m going to get a bit more precise with the phrasing of this question. Then I can tell you how long certain things tend to take based on certain conditions. All this is based on my experience, and is based on the average rate of progress for the average voice.

A more precise question

When someone asks, “how long does it take to learn to sing?”, this is actually several questions all packaged up into one. Here’s how we break them apart:

  • Point A – where is this singer presently at with their voice?
  • Point B – where is this singer looking to get to with their voice?
  • How quickly can we cover the distance between point A and point B?

To clarify, if all we are talking about is singing songs at all, then anyone who can sing in tune can sing. What we are going to get specific about today, is singing well. We’ll define this by both the singers’ standards, and the wider music world’s standards.

Point A: Where is a singer’s starting point?

In every initial consultation, we conduct an assessment on a singer’s voice to identify where their voice is at presently. All tone, range, power, control, etc is a by-product of good vocal function. Once a sufficient level of functional ability is a given, then a given style or aesthetic outcome tends to drop out without too much effort.

But EVERY singer starts out in a different place. I’ve worked with totally untrained singers, who have barely sung before, whose instrument is doing so little wrong that they are on their way to singing quite difficult material very early on. Their starting point – their point A – is way in advance of the average.

In contrast, I’ve worked with professional singers who are incredibly musical, and with plenty of training, but the way their voice is put together means their point A is sometimes behind the average point A… it’s their musicality that covers over this.

Most singers are generally biting off more than they can chew. Guitarists and cover artists are notoriously bad for this, insisting on singing songs in the original key, even when they don’t sound that great. Remember, there’s no prizes for singing a song in the original key, badly, only for sounding great.

So we must know where someone is starting out, and we must be realistic about what they can do at that stage to both continue to sing their desired material, while also deploying that material in a way that keeps their voice progressing.

Point B: Where does a singer want to get to?

This hinges heavily on their musical goals.

If I get the average male singer coming in, wanting to sing something like Buble, Sinatra, etc, then it’s going to be a shorter time frame. This is because the range demanded by the desired material is high but not excessively so.

For the average female singer wanting to sing Karen Carpenter, lower Adele pieces, etc, I’d expect a similar time period. Again, this is not saying such aspiring singers would be at their absolute best, but access to notes and a reasonably even tone could be expected within that sort of time frame. It’s an initial standard we are aiming for.

In contrast, if a male singer wants to sing substantially higher material, ala U2, or classic rock material ala Journey, or maybe even Stevie Wonder, Bruno Mars, etc, we’ll be looking at a much longer time-frame to acquire that more advanced standard. Same would be true for the higher ranged equivalent female artists.

Bear in mind that if a voice is weightier than the average, it will take longer. The extra depth and power in the voice gives more raw material we need to shape and hone to build a smooth and useable instrument. The lighter the voice, the less time it will take to access the notes. But more time will need to be spent in making the voice sounding full enough to not sound weedy or thin.

How fast can we move from point A to point B?

This is down to frequency of practice, duration of practice, how accurately are they practicing the material they need to be practicing, and how receptive is their body to the new training regimen.

Some people practice extensively, but do not practice well, e.g. not doing strict voice work, insisting on keys that are too high, doing it whilst distracted, etc. Such singers are usually ingraining bad habits despite the long practice hours.

Others practice less often but are more effective and productive with their practice. Even 10–15 minutes of targeted, intentional practice a few times a week can move a voice forward enormously.

Some people’s bodies are incredibly responsive to being shown good technique, and their voices can advance rapidly because of how fast their body seems to take on new muscle memory. Others find their body is more stubborn, and it takes a LOT more repetition (done correctly) to elicit the same kind of response.

Conclusion

Short version: The simpler the material, and the more close-to-the-average someone’s voice is, the less time it takes to sing material well.

If I’m working with someone every week/most weeks, and they are putting in a few hours practice a week outside of sessions, I’d expect them to be getting to that initial standard in a year or two. Their tone would need improvement to do the material justice, but in terms of access to the notes and having an even consistent tone, I’d expect this within that time frame.

To be clear, most will acquire the notes (at least in exercises) far sooner. Typically this happens within the first few months of starting work on their voice. But to make those notes feel comfortable and sound/feel as easy as pie, that takes time… it’s totally worth it, but it’s not an overnight transformation.

To get to the more advanced standard. E.g. jazz, classical, rock, higher pop, etc, will typically take a few years more, sometimes many more years of work, as we need that initial standard as a foundation to build from. Remember, we are not talking about just squeezing out notes, grinding or blasting out those climaxes. We are talking about truly training the voice to acquire and never relinquish the range, because it’s done correctly and easily. As such, there are no shortcuts.

Caveats

All of the above is based on an “average voice“, though no voice is truly “average“. Everyone’s is lighter/weightier/fuller/smoother/more biting/more textured than the average voice. If anything, the more “average” the voice, the less interesting it is to listen to.

Furthermore, most people who work on their voice regularly become hyper-aware of what they struggle with. Even when no-one else hears it or feels it. Singers who take their voices seriously become even more dedicated to improving their voice. They end up ironing out all the things that bother them about their voice.

Even when they can sing much much higher, they are still lingering in the range that is most manageable for them. This compounds their vocal quality in a useable range so that no sing ever sounds bad or feels wrong in their voice.

I trust that these rough time-frames give you an understanding as to the speed at which we can acquire notes. But please note that it takes longer to truly own those notes and your voice, and to make them feel as effortless as speaking. Believe me when I say, that feeling is an amazing one. It really is wonderful when you can have a bash at almost any song and figure out a version that makes you sound great.

If that’s something you’re looking to get to, and you’d like to start work with me, you can book yourself in right here.

What Causes Weak Voices? Common Reasons Your Voice Sounds Weak

What Causes Weak Voices? Common Reasons Your Voice Sounds Weak


Short answer: a “weak” voice is usually caused by a mix of under‑use/deconditioning, overuse or strain, inefficient technique, and/or temporary health factors (illness, reflux, allergies), sometimes compounded by age‑related change, hormones/medication and fatigue or stress.

I see this across singers and heavy voice users alike: power and tone drop, notes feel unstable, and the voice tires quickly. The goal isn’t a quick hack—it’s identifying which of the causes apply to you and then rebuilding strength and efficiency with targeted training.

  • Deconditioning/under‑use: muscles lose strength and coordination without regular, directed training.
  • Overuse/strain: speaking or singing too loud/long without support leads to fatigue and loss of power.
  • Inefficient technique: breath/valve timing, anchoring and resonance not working together.
  • Health factors: colds, allergies, reflux, dehydration, poor sleep; sometimes thyroid or meds.
  • Age‑related change: tissue and hormonal shifts can reduce stability without specific counter‑training.
  • Stress & load management: high demand days with no recovery plan weaken output over time.

Below I explain how each factor weakens the voice, the signs to look for, and what a focused coaching plan does to restore strength and clarity.

Traits of a Weak or Weaker Voice

The exact traits of a weak voice are fairly identifiable for most, e.g.

  • lighter or thinner timbre
  • excessive breathiness
  • instability in the tone
  • quiet speaking or singing volume

However, we need to put this in greater context, in that all voices are unique and different. Even with training and maximum vocal development, some voices will be lighter and quieter than others and others will be louder and weightier than others (and some will be in-between). Some voices when trained perfectly will have more breathiness in their tone, others will have less/none. We perceive this as vocal weakness when these traits seem excessive.

What Causes A Weak Voice?

Age

I have written countless times about how singing voices are meant to peak in their 50s, but this only holds true if people are working on their voice and training it to handle this. In reality, most people don’t look after their voices, and as their body becomes less supple and robust with age (compared with youth) wear and tear is more easily acquired, and takes longer to recover from.

Older voices tend to lose muscle (when not built or maintained), and can lead to vocal ‘wobble’ in the voice. This is where there is insufficient muscle or muscle tone to maintain a stable tone in the voice. This is usually most overt in female choral singers over age 50/60. As the voice becomes weightier with age, such singers desire to sound more choral, so resort to a lighter and lighter sound to side-step the increased weight in their voice. Men tend to notice the bottom end of their voice seep away, and end up with a drier scratchier version of what they once had.

In both cases this is a decrease in muscle tone, and an increase in vocal weakness. In reality, good vocal control involves integrating the bottom range into the top range, and learning to navigate that with no perceiveable switch. This gets harder to solve the later one comes to train their voice. Hence, age is one of the biggest challenges people can face in terms of keeping their voice sounding even and strong.

Damage

This can be acute or chronic. Sometimes people suffer from more serious incidents like nodules, granulomas, etc, but it can be as simple as speaking excessively on a voice that is losing its muscle tone (per my point about age).

If there is swelling, wear/tear, abnormality in the vocal fold tissue or other parts of the voice, often people will be able to speak but something will not sound right. Some men or women who smoke or drink, suffer from acid reflux, etc can have a noticeable raspy sounding voice much of the time. There is a precipitating injury (however mild), but the act of constantly speaking keeps wearing down the voice, making the issue worse and denying the body a chance to recover. Singers coming off a cold often don’t give themselves enough time to recover and end up limping on with a weak voice for many months.

More serious injuries, e.g. trauma from giving birth, neck injury, vocal trauma from singing, can also be a factor. The biggest issue I’ve seen is people not fully recovering before getting back to doing what they were doing before, especially worrisome if the behaviour they were engaging in before was responsible for such damage.

Lack of Vocal Development

I am trying to avoid the use of the word ‘training’ here, quite simply because I try not to think about my voice when I am speaking. Similarly so when singing. Our goal with vocal coaching is to build a voice that is (well, yes, trained… but that is) vocally developed such that it does not suffer from the above issues, whether or not we are deeply thinking about it. When a voice can move evenly from the bottom to the top and back again, with no breaks, flips or switches, we tend not to suffer from such issues.

Why would this be? The act of doing the training instils in the body not just the correct technique, but a physical aversion to doing something it knows is a bad idea. I can tell when I’m at a pub and I’m speaking slightly too loud – how? Because it feels wrong. I have used my voice enough through training such that I know when I’m overstepping the mark. I know when an environment is not conducive to me being heard, so I avoid trying to be heard over volumes I cannot compete with. This is a by-product of training, but it’s a state of vocal development that keeps voices functioning well at any age.

Improper Deployment of Their Voice

This overlaps with my previous point, which is centred around not trying to deploy your voice in a way it cannot perform.

For example, if you have a lighter voice, your voice will be quieter but also less deep than other voices. Trying to compete with deeper voices in the frequency that deeper voices dominate in is a waste of time. You won’t sound right, you’ll sound quiet, and it’ll be exhausting. Repeatedly doing this also wears the voice down and introduces weakness/instability into the voice.

Instead, we have to build voices so that they can operate well in whatever range they work best in. The richness and fullness in one’s voice comes from building it and using it well, rather than trying to compete with others at what their voices do well. This is not something I can advise on without working with and building someone’s voice to a reasonable degree, and by then, the vocal development tends to do all the heavy lifting for me/the voice user.

There’s many examples I could give, but I hope this gives you a sense of why voices can find themselves becoming weak and sounding as such.

Conclusion

The answer to all of this is point 3. If we can instil a level of vocal development in someone’s instrument and body, they will tend to do more of the good things, avoid more of the bad things, and have some physiological awareness of inevitable changes that could otherwise derail their voice.

How hard should it feel to sing well?

Here’s a question for you: How hard should singing feel?

Particularly when working on our voices, having some idea of the hallmarks of “doing it right” would be helpful. How difficult should it feel to do? Should it feel really physically difficult? Or when we get better, should it feel devoid of effort? If it’s somewhere in between, how can we tell?

It’s a tricky one, that’s for certain. I certainly can’t give you a perfect and definitive answer. Nevertheless, I’ve got a few illustrations that may help you explore the complexity of answering this question.

Learning to drive

Take learning to drive and to park a car. If you have to keep doing 17-point turns and endure repeated attempts to get your car into the space, that is typically a sign that you are not yet efficient or competent at that specific skill. Hitting the cars next to you is also a bad sign.

As we get better, we might find we can do it in just a few turns, or a few attempts. After years of driving, many find they can swing the car into tighter and tighter spaces from weirder and weirder angles, in one smooth move.

The hallmarks of “doing it right” with driving are fairly obvious from the outside and also as the driver. The metrics are visual and physical. We can tell that we got the car in the space, we can visually see it’s aligned, we can count how many attempts it took, etc. We can even recall whether or not we heard any scraping sounds as we parked up!

Consider our question
Is it physically hard to maneuver a car like this? Continue reading “How hard should it feel to sing well?”

What Yoga Taught Me About Voice

Before we begin, I must make clear, I am in no way an expert on yoga. I’m not proficient enough at said art to advise or teach someone, so if you’re hoping for advice on positions, you’re out of luck.

However, from years of sports, voice discipline and martial arts, I have relatively good body awareness. From the nature of training voice as well, the “learning experience” is something I spend a lot of time immersed in, and I’m used to trying to find more efficient ways of doing things, especially through repetition.

As such, a few things came to mind during yoga practice over the last few years or so that mirror my experience with voice training. Some of these I thought worth sharing:

1. Repetition and refinement

There are many positions in yoga. Some are referred to as their anglicised names like “cat-cow” or “child’s pose”, and others utilise the original sanskrit. There’s one pose I found particularly difficult at first: “downward facing dog”:

I am relatively strong, but very quickly I was shaking in the shoulders. I got a little stronger with repetition over the first handful of practice sessions, but I was clearly missing something. Whatever I was missing was something that simply repeating what I was doing wouldn’t work. As I kept practicing, I made tiny adjustments to my body position to try to find a less strenuous way of holding it. Then, I made one particular adjustment that enabled my skeleton to bear more of my weight. Suddenly, an equilibrium was reached, and the muscles stopped shaking.

The point is this: repetition and refinement go hand in hand. You can’t carve away the imperfection without repeatedly facing it. This requires embracing getting it wrong and improving through conscious repetition and refinement.

The same is true with voice, or anything for that matter. People think they can trick their voice to the top notes, or that once they’ve got the top notes, they’ve got them and they don’t need to do any further work. On the contrary, repetition and refinement will always pay dividends to those willing to put in the work. #

Whether that’s easier access, more power for less work, more stamina, repetition and refinement is critical. But what else follows from this? Continue reading “What Yoga Taught Me About Voice”

There is no one size fits all vocal warmup routine

If you were to go onto Youtube right now, and search for “vocal warmup routine“, you will find hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of videos.

Many of these will contain similar exercises, but many of them will also contain conflicting advice. Such conflicts won’t be covered in this article.

The top video on Youtube (at time of writing) has racked up 22 million views. This is clearly a topic people want the answers to, and I totally understand this. In truth, I actually use very similar exercises to some of these videos, at least on paper.

So if people want good exercises to warmup their voice, and there’s enough similarity between what I’m doing and what these Youtubers are doing in the videos, why haven’t I put out a video on this?

Philosophically simple, technically more complex

As per the title of today’s article, it’s because there is no one size fits all vocal warmup routine (or vocal practice routine for that matter).

But why?

The problem philosophically is relatively simple: a generalised video does not take into the account the specific individuality and vocal requirements of any given singer. Such a general video also ignores the fundamental learning process that underpins any individual who is looking to acquire a technical skill.

Here’s what needs to happen

To deploy any exercise in someone’s voice, we need the following three elements (at least):

1) Select an appropriate exercise for a given singer, and teach the singer to do it correctly
2) Take that exercise over an appropriate range in their voice for a desired result
3) Develop their ability to have a constructive self-guided practice

Let’s go through each of these to clarify: Continue reading “There is no one size fits all vocal warmup routine”

The Most Insane Teaching Instructions I’ve Ever Heard

Many of my clients have been through numerous coaches/teachers before they end up coming to me. This means I often get at least a little insight into the kinds insane teaching instructions that other vocal coaches, singing teachers, speech therapists, etc have asked my clients to do.

Recently, someone reminded me they’d had sessions with another coach. The face of disgust they pulled when they recalled those sessions made me ask them what they’d just remembered. When they told me, I honestly couldn’t believe what they’d been told to do.

This then reminded me of all the insane instructions I’ve heard that other instructors have given over the years. I thought I’d share a few of these (and my horror at such instructions), but more helpfully to discuss why someone might think this, and why such thinking is erroneous or unhelpful when it comes to building your voice.

1. “If you can’t hit the note, just croak it

Continue reading “The Most Insane Teaching Instructions I’ve Ever Heard”

Levelling Up: You can’t unhear that next level of quality

I like watches. I’ve always had an interest in taking things apart, understanding how they work, and learning about the history of how things develop.

One of the earliest non-fiction books I ever read in earnest was called Longitude. This is all about the man who invented the first accurate chronometer for use at sea, to help guide ships on long distance voyages.

As it happens, in the countryside area of Southwell near Nottingham, there is the British Horological Society. This has huge numbers of watches, clocks, chronometers, and all manner of time-keeping devices.

In one of the rooms, they have scaled-up models of components inside wrist-watches. Each of the models tracks the history of certain technological developments that levelled up watch making. Continue reading “Levelling Up: You can’t unhear that next level of quality”

Mark JW Graham LogoWant our FREE 'Singing 101' Vocal Prospectus?