One of the biggest (fallacious) objections I have encountered against formal voice training, is that it is formulaic and limits artistry. This objection is one I tend not to hear too much these days, but I used to.
Usually it was overly set-in-their-ways artists/aspiring artists, and they’d want my help, but they would be unwilling to change anything about what they were doing.
They would want more range and power, but they’d be unwilling to adjust their present approach. They’d want me to solve the vocal fatigue and damage they were encountering, but they would be unwilling to change even one iota in what they were doing.
I’m sure you can see why this is a foolish path to take. In the words of Henry Ford, “If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got.”
Humour me though. For a moment, let’s argue their corner. The way vocal technique works is that it accepts there is a particular way the voice is meant to work. The vocal folds and vocal tract have an optimal way of working, and this is the same for all voices, glossing over minute variations between different voices.
Surely then, this would mean that as we train our voices, then trained voices should end up all sounding the same as each other? If we train voices to all work “that one way“, then all voices would sound start to sound identical? If this were the case, then it would stand to reason that one would want to avoid formal vocal training to avoid this overly homogenised result? Continue reading “How Voice Training Reveals Your Artistry”